Synastry contact

Moon Trine Moon Synastry: When Your Feelings Fit Together Easily

Short answer: Moon trine Moon synastry (comparing two birth charts) means that how each of you feels, your moods, needs and comforting habits, sits in easy accord with the other's. Each of you has a Moon, so the contact is the same from either side. A trine usually joins signs of the same element, so it tends to read as likeness: you often speak the same language about feelings without being copies of each other. "Raphael" in 1905 writes that friendship follows when the Sun or Moon in one chart is in a friendly aspect with the lights in the other. This page reads that as a tendency, and reading it as covering Moon to Moon is an inference from his wording. The cost of ease can be that little gets said, and that neither of you is the steadier one. It is one contact among many, and what gets built on it is up to the two of you.

Two Moons at ease

Every chart has a Moon. It is how you feel: your moods and needs, the habits that comfort you, what it takes for you to feel safe, and what you do when you are tired, hurt or just want things to be familiar. Moon trine Moon in synastry means your Moon and their Moon are about 120° apart in the zodiac. Each of you has a Moon, so the contact is the same from either side: your Moon and their Moon, their Moon and your Moon.

A trine usually joins two signs of the same element: fire with fire, earth with earth, air with air, water with water. (Usually, not always: a trine that starts near the edge of a sign can reach into the next element.) That is why this contact tends to read as likeness. You are not the same place, as in a conjunction, but you tend to speak the same language about feelings. What comforts one of you often comforts the other, and what wears one of you out is often familiar to the other.

It can turn up between friends, siblings, colleagues, flatmates, or a parent and their child just as well as between partners, and it is only one of many contacts in any two charts.

What it is like to share this

Because both of you have a Moon in this contact, there is no one who steadies and one who is steadied. Each of you is both the person being understood and the one doing the understanding.

Living near someone with a Moon like yours often means your moods need little translation. How much noise you can take after a long day, whether a bad mood wants company or a closed door, when you would like to eat, how you like a home to feel: these tend to be close enough that you rarely have to argue for them. Your needs do not usually seem strange to the other, and theirs do not usually seem strange to you.

What makes a trine different from two Moons in the same spot is that you are not identical. You tend to feel close without being copies, so there may be small differences in pace or taste that make the likeness feel like company, not an echo. A trine is an easy fit, not a merger.

Mood moves between you gently. When one of you comes home flat or edgy, the other tends to notice early and often responds in a way the first can actually use. Comfort from someone whose needs are different can miss. Here it tends to arrive in a form that fits.

What each gives, and what each may want

Put simply, each of you tends to give the other the experience of having feelings that make sense. Because the giving and the receiving follow the same path, there is often little effort in it.

What each of you tends to give without trying is acceptance of the other's moods as ordinary. You may not feel the need to fix them, hurry them or explain them away. You often know which silence is a bad one and which is a restful one. You tend to leave the other's routines mostly undisturbed, partly because you have much the same ones.

What each of you may want in return is mostly that: your feelings taken as real, your habits left alone, a little time at your own pace. These often matter to both of you, and here they tend to be easy to give and easy to get.

What the contact does not tend to supply is a push. Neither of you is the one who calls for a change, since nothing between you is uncomfortable enough to call for it. If one of you wants things to move, that usually has to come from somewhere other than this contact.

How it might look

These are sketches, not reports: illustrations of how the contact might show up across different kinds of pairs.

  • Flatmates. One of them gets in late after a bad shift. The other has the lamp low and the kettle on before a word is said, and does not ask. Both go to bed feeling that the evening went well.
  • Parent and child. A parent and their child, now a teenager, both recover from a bad day by being near someone and saying very little. On a school night they are in the kitchen at the same time, each with something to do with their hands, and the day eases for both.
  • Colleagues. A reorganisation is announced. Two colleagues both want to hear more before they react, and both want a quiet corner to think. They sit together at lunch and do not discuss it much, and each leaves feeling less alone with it.
  • Siblings. Two siblings with the same idea of what makes a holiday feel like a holiday: the same hour for breakfast, the same dislike of rushing. Their relatives used to find them dull to travel with. The two of them found each other restful.
  • Friends. One of you says you would like a slow weekend. The other says that sounds right. Nothing is planned, and both go home having had the weekend they wanted.
  • Partners. After a hard month at work, one of them is flat and short. The other does not take it personally, and sees to the small things, the meals and the lights, without making a show of it. Neither feels they have had to ask.

In each sketch the same thing happens: one person's way of coping with a feeling is something the other already knows how to be near.

In fire, earth, air or water

Because a trine usually keeps to one element, the element colours the whole contact. In plain terms: fire is enthusiasm and action, earth is practical steadiness, air is talk and ideas, water is feeling.

Fire. You both tend to feel things quickly and recover as fast. It might look like two friends who have a short argument over a cancelled plan and are laughing about it before the evening is over.

Earth. You both tend to feel secure when things are solid and predictable. It might look like two colleagues who keep the same lunch hour and the same corner table, and who find it a comfort that the other would never suggest changing it.

Air. You both tend to sort out a feeling by talking it through. It might look like two siblings on the phone, each working out why they are on edge, and each finding the answer in a sentence the other said.

Water. You both tend to feel deeply and to take on the mood of a room. It might look like a parent and their grown child who sit through a tense family dinner and each know afterwards, without a word, how the other found it.

What ease can cost

The ease is real, and it has a cost that belongs to a shared kind of Moon in particular.

Because the two of you are comfortable, neither of you has much reason to say what you feel. A mood that would be spoken about between people with different needs can stay unspoken here, since each of you assumes the other has understood. When something changes for one of you, such as a loss, a move or a hard year, the signal may be slow to arrive, because neither of you is used to sending it or receiving it.

You may also share the same way of avoiding things. If both of you go quiet when you are hurt, or both put off the same difficult conversation, nobody in the pair may be doing it differently. Often it takes a third person to notice that what each of you treats as simply how things are is only how the two of you do things.

And a trine does not tend to supply a steadier one. If you are both anxious in the same way, or both low, the contact is a pleasant one to be low in, and it may not be one that gets either of you out of it.

None of this is a flaw in the contact or in either of you. It is what this kind of ease is like to live with, and it sits beside a plain advantage: a hard thing tends to be easier to say, because each of you often assumes the other is on your side.

From the sources

What the older sources say

Raphael (*The Guide to Astrology*, 1905, p. 96) is the source for this contact. He writes that if the Sun or Moon in one chart is in conjunction with, or in "friendly aspect" with "the lights in the other nativity", and that "then will friendship follow". His page prints the conjunction as a symbol, so that word is not quoted. (A nativity is the old word for a birth chart.) "The lights" is his word for the Sun and Moon. He does not say Moon to Moon: his line speaks of the Sun or Moon in one chart and the lights in the other. Reading it as covering Moon to Moon is an inference from its wording, not something he spells out. His "friendly aspect" is a general phrase and does not name the trine.

Three more sources are used here as supporting, and each speaks of the luminaries (the Sun and Moon) in two charts in general, not of the Moon to the Moon. Alan Leo (*How to Judge a Nativity*, p. 221): "The luminaries in favourable accord in two nativities will produce sympathy". Vivian Robson (1922, p. 140) calls it "the strongest sign of affinity" when the luminaries in two maps are in conjunction or good aspect, which he says indicates "radical harmony". Ptolemy (Ashmand, 1822, pp. 192–193) says that where familiarity exists "only as regards the places of the luminaries", friendship is established by spontaneous will and is "the best and most secure". He means a bond through the luminaries by any of his kinds of link, not the trine in particular.

Ptolemy also calls the trine and the sextile "harmonious" because they join signs "of the same kind" (Ashmand, 1822, p. 38, I.16). That is a statement about aspects in general, not about two people, and only the sign geometry is used here. Ptolemy's "kind" is masculine or feminine (the old names for the two halves of the zodiac, alternating sign by sign), not element, so it does not separate trine from sextile either.

None of these sources tells a trine from a sextile: Raphael writes "friendly aspect", Leo "favourable accord", Robson "good aspect", and Ptolemy names the two together. The difference this page draws, that a trine reads as likeness because it usually joins signs of the same element, is this site's reading, based on the kinds of sign each aspect usually joins. The older books do not say it.

The sources state their readings flatly: the luminaries in accord "will produce sympathy", and "then will friendship follow". Reading that as a tendency, not a description of a relationship or a promise of how it turns out, is this site's reading. So is everything in the other sections about moods and habits, what each of you gives and may want, and what ease can cost: none of the sources says it.

Ptolemy's chapter on marriage (p. 184) and the sentence after Robson's (p. 140) also give the contact a direction by the man and the woman, and Zadkiel's line on the Moon in the same degree in both charts (1861, p. 109, not cited here) is worded in terms of the sexes. This page does not use any of them, and the contact is described here for any two people. The sources give the contact no direction that is needed here, since each of you has a Moon.

Is this you two?

  • One of you can read the other's mood from the doorway, and it is rarely news.
  • What helps you feel better is often the same thing, and you rarely have to explain it.
  • You can be quiet together and it does not feel like a gap that needs filling.
  • The routines one of you likes are ones the other already keeps, or does not mind.
  • Now and then neither of you says what is wrong, because neither of you thinks it needs saying.
  • Sometimes you both feel low at once, and it takes a third person to help either of you out of it.

Sources

  • Ptolemy, Tetrabiblos, trans. J. M. Ashmand (London: Davis and Dickson, 1822), I.16, p. 38 read it
  • Ptolemy, Tetrabiblos, trans. J. M. Ashmand (London: Davis and Dickson, 1822), IV.7 "Friends and Enemies", pp. 192–193 read it
  • Alan Leo, How to Judge a Nativity (1912; pages from the 1928 printing), p. 221 read it
  • "Raphael" (R. T. Cross), The Guide to Astrology (London: Foulsham, 1905), p. 96 read it
  • Vivian E. Robson, A Students' Text-Book of Astrology (London: Cecil Palmer, 1922), p. 140 read it